Carolyn J. Rose
If you don’t indulge in false
on a regular basis, chances are you’ve gone to Wishful Thinking Land now and
then. Perhaps on election night. Or in a casino. At a sporting event. Or even
during a marriage counseling session.
Experts say false hope is
unrealistic and ignores evidence pointing to an impossible or highly unlikely
outcome. But distinguishing false hope from the “real deal” can be as difficult
as picking the AI faked photo out of a lineup. One reason is that there are
many instances where what seemed to be impossible came to pass. Outnumbered
forces won battles. Underdog sports teams triumphed. Dark horses came in first.
So if false hope doesn’t
always turn out to have been false, and “real” hope can also be an exercise in
futility, then why shouldn’t I live in La-La Land now and then? Why shouldn’t I
take mental vacations from harsh reality, painful truths, and negative lessons
from the past?
For example, why shouldn’t I
cling to the hope that the refrigerator light, dead for three years, will beam
on once more? And why shouldn’t I cross my fingers and hope it will bring the
oven light, deceased since 2020, back to life with it?
Okay. I know I’m wasting time.
False hope hasn’t changed anything. I should buy and install new bulbs.
But I don’t bake much and what
I don’t see I don’t snack on. Besides, lightning has been known to strike.
Maybe a bolt of electricity will light up those bulbs.
I’ll give them one more day.
Or maybe two.
No comments:
Post a Comment